Archive for the ‘Social media’ Category

Why brands shouldn’t bother with small talk

November 28, 2011

Kathleen Gunther

Have you noticed it’s the same people who whinge and complain about the rain and the cold on Facebook, are also in shock at the first sign of the heat in summer?

Could it be they just don’t have anything better to say?

Some brands are guilty of saying irrelevant things just for the sake of saying something. Telling me what the weather is like or asking me how my weekend was on Facebook is simply (boring) elevator conversation, if you ask me. I mean, we’re patronised enough by a lot of mass media advertising, so if I have chosen to engage with a brand, I need a reason to care.

I am quite selective with brands I like on Facebook, but a couple I have recently ‘liked’ have certainly lived up to my expectations. The first is Batlow Cider which gives me useful information like where I can purchase the product as the brand grows, the highs and lows of growing the apple harvest to make the cider and how it affects the Batlow community. Plus, it has a strong affiliation with music that I can relate to.

I’ve also ‘fanned’ a couple of my favourite music artists after seeing them live and have been given great content like a preview of a new album, discounts on songs, and competitions engaging fans to contribute to album covers etc.

The lower involvement products do have a harder task to involve and engage; but by keeping the content relevant, having a level of exclusivity, and humanising the people behind the brand to encourage a sense of community, then you will have a far better level of influence with your fans.

As the philosopher Plato is credited saying: “A wise man speaks because he has something to say; a fool because he has to say something”.

PS: For people living in Sydney – we have an average of a metre of rain (40 inches) each year, but few years are average years. There is no rainy season, and the rain usually goes quickly, but sudden storms can be common, and “showers” means downpours in some places and nothing a few hundred metres away. Learn to live with it.

Bookmark and Share

Don’t be a twit: think before you tweet

November 23, 2011

 Jayne Andrews

I am one of the people who agreed with Qantas chief executive Alan Joyce’s decision to ground the flights a few weeks ago. I have always been against trade unions and striking (may be being a child of the 70s born under Margaret Thatcher influenced me). It is possibly also because I’ve always worked in advertising, so if there was a strike every time we worked overtime, there would be no industry. Anyway, back to the point – I have a few friends that work at Qantas who can’t speak more highly of Mr Joyce and his decisions. Their stories of how he treats his staff certainly have created some positive word of mouth for the brand in my peer group.

But, what was Qantas thinking when it created a Twitter campaign inviting people to tweet in about their Luxury flying experiences? “What is your dream luxury inflight experience  (Be creative!) Answer must include #QantasLuxury.” The prize – a luxury amenity kit and a pair of pyjamas.

Obviously the hashtag began trending across the Twittersphere. But it doesn’t take a genius to anticipate that the tone of the tweets was not exactly in line with what management hoped for.

Just one example of the gags that followed

@the-aaron-smith said: “#qantasluxury is chartering a Greyhound bus and arriving at your destination days before your grounded Qantas flight”

You would think after the drama of the last few weeks, the PR pros at Qantas would be all over such a promotion. Wasn’t it obvious that consumers would love an opportunity to take a dig at the brand? Perhaps Qantas should have asked Ashton Kutcher to be involved in their PR, instead of John Travolta. He can’t fly a plane but he has certainly learnt his lesson on Twitter recently too. And, as for @Mrs Kutcher. I bet she had wished she’d chosen a different moniker when she joined up. The 4.29 million people that follow her will know immediately when those divorce papers are signed.

 
Bookmark and Share

Social media is just the tip of the WOM iceberg

November 16, 2011

Ester Groenendaal

My colleague shared this infographic from WOMMA with the office. Infographics always inspire me; I’m a very visual person and I love stats and numbers, so they’re a great way of visually representing statistics. But that’s not what I wanted to talk about in my blog.

Apart from the fact this infographic is a great summary of what word of mouth is all about and how effective it is, it also reminded me of a fact that we experience every day at Soup, but which, if you believe everything you read about digital marketing, seems hard to believe: Nine in 10 branded conversations happen offline.

People talk about our clients’ campaigns with their friends, family and colleagues. Give them something to share around (a product, for example) and they have even more to talk about. And, of course, they also share things on Facebook or on a blog, but the vast majority of the conversations happen in the real world.

I find it frustrating that there is a disproportionate focus on online media and social media when it comes to word of mouth.

This is not to deny the role the internet plays in marketing and word of mouth. Our Soupers spread the word just like anyone else; through real-world conversations and online conversations like Facebook and blogs.

A great example is one of our recent campaigns where there is an effective online element is for Vita Weat Lunch slices. For this campaign we have a blogger element where we’ve asked bloggers to post a review. The bloggers go above and beyond. Have a look at this post, seriously, it’s amazing. Or this one. Sometimes we launch a Facebook page as part of a Soup campaign where influencers are the first to be engaged. A great example is the Tailwagging Facebook page we just launched together with Novartis Animal Heath Australia for Sentinel, which results in great consumer content.

Of course, our clients (and we too) are very enthusiastic about the online parts of our campaigns, because it’s so visible that people go above and beyond for their brands.

But although it’s not as visible, what’s happening offline is actually much bigger and therefore more influential. I would never suggest ignoring online media, just keep it in perspective and remember we still mostly live in the “real” world, not just a virtual one.

Bookmark and Share

Liking you isn’t enough

November 7, 2011

Emma Chow

Facebook has had a huge effect on the way we communicate and it’s a potentially powerful place for brands to engage with consumers, but to confuse simply being present on Facebook, or even having someone like your page with word of mouth is to misunderstand word of mouth and how it works for brands.

Leading WOM researcher Ed Keller put it really well in this post — brands on Facebook may get millions of likes, but on average, 0.45% are actively engaged fans. For example Coke has 34 million fans, but just 56,000 of them (0.2%) are “engaged”. But offline there are 860 million conversations involving Coke in one month.

Word of mouth is not social media and social media is not word of mouth – we live the majority of our lives offline and this is where the majority of branded conversations happen.
Bookmark and Share

Should all brands tick the Facebook box?

October 27, 2011

Katie Palmer
There is a palpable sense in the industry that brands are all desperate to get themselves on Facebook as they feel that it is a social media ‘box’ that they need to tick on their marketing plans.
It’s a “box” because done well can provide a place for people who want to align themselves with a brand or a product can do so in an environment that they already engage with. By “liking” or commenting on a brands page, not only are they creating content for people within that page, but also providing the “inference of influence” (if I am allowing a brand to be included on my personal page it shows that I recommend it without me having to explicitly say so) for their friends within the social space.
But I also sense brands are not putting a resource value into building a facebook page as a place to genuinely interact and listen to their consumers. Only 5% of all posts on a brand page are answered by brands leaving their followers and contributors frustrated.
Neglecting to utilise the opportunity to connect with consumers can ultimately lead to less engagement with the brand and is the biggest reason so many of these pages feel like ghost towns populated by a junior brand manager asking fans on a Friday afternoon what they’ll be “getting up to on the weekend” but closing down the computer as soon as they hit “send”.
Just like a “site under construction” holding page in the context of the broader internet – unless you’re prepared to maintain your brand presence on Facebook, perhaps it’s best to leave that box unticked.

Bookmark and Share

Australia needs an Amazon

October 23, 2011

Ed Thornley

Being fairly new to these shores (I arrived in Australia just eight months ago from the UK), I am still in adjustment mode to the differences. Fair enough, the changes from the UK to Australia aren’t exactly massive, but it is in fact the little differences that you seem to notice more.

Don’t get me wrong the improvements in lifestyle in the land down under are there for all to see, however there is one thing that really bugs me and that is the nature of online shopping here.

As a mid 20s guy, I am a massive consumer of online shopping in the UK. I mean, how many guys my age like wasting their free time traipsing round the malls on a sunny Saturday afternoon, when you can just click online in your lunchbreak and get it delivered the next day?

Yes, there are a few general online shops around in Australia, such as http://www.oo.com.au/#, http://www.crazysales.com.au/, http://www.myshopping.com.au/ as well as specialised high-street stores also having an online site, such as JB HIFI and GAME etc and there is always an option to shop on US, or UK sites, but who really wants to pay more postage than they are paying for the product?

But what all these online shopping sites are missing is a form of community, a place where comments can be read and products can be reviewed. This provides visitors to the site information about a product that is independent, not directly from the manufacturer or a marketer and can therefore be trusted by the everyday consumer.

Back in the UK I would buy everything from blue tack to TVs online, partly due to convenience and partly due to price. As a typical male non savvy shopper a site like www.amazon.co.uk  has always helped me to choose the best and most suitable product on the market simply by reading the 1000s of honest reviews and seeing how highly the product has been rated on a simple scale.  Yes, this type of site exists here, such as http://www.productreview.com.au/ and without too much of a shameless plug http://www.thesoup.com.au/ but why not have an all-encompassing site that can deliver cheap prices, fast delivery times as well as trusted reviews. Working at Soup, has only confirmed just how important these reviews are; people trust other people not marketing spiel or ads.

Maybe living in the UK has made me a spoilt consumer with multiple easy options or maybe someone is missing a massive gap in the Australian online marketplace to deliver products and trusted reviews under the same umbrella.

Bookmark and Share

Don’t ignore your greatest asset

September 23, 2011

Michele BrayMichele Bray

A recent study from Gallup reported in this article found that the best way to use social media is to ignite your existing customers to spread the word about your products. In Flip the Funnel, Joseph Jaffe talked about the reverse AIDA model and the emphasis on igniting those that have just bought or experienced it. Your current customers are certainly a segment not to be ignored.

Some of the key things I took out of this article – which certainly support what we know at Soup – are:

  • 74 percent of loyal customers engaged their social networks in a complimentary way about their favoured brand – pretty good odds by anyone’s standards.
  • The likelihood of people relying on online and TV ads to decide what product or service to buy is about the same as the likelihood of relying on company Twitter or Facebook pages – a mere 1 percent.
  • And probably the best reminder of all is that the most frequent type of social networking is still offline; face-to-face or over the phone. So “don’t confuse the channel (social media) for the desired outcome, (social networking)”.

Bookmark and Share

Social media riot

August 9, 2011

  Jayne Andrews

I’m really interested to see how much flak Blackberry and social media is getting for fuelling the London riots. Apparently, the thugs have been using the free text messaging between Blackberries as a way of spreading the word to join the riot. To quote the UK Sun: ‘The trouble-making rabble used social networking to organise an orgy of violence and destruction across the capital.’  It seems a popular trend by tabloid media to blame “the net” or “social media” when really they need to be focused on the thugs, who prior to the internet, we all know would have found a different means to rally up their loutish friends.

But then, a few minutes after reading about the evils of Twitter, I get sent a link on Facebook to join Supporting the Met against the London riots. It has an incredible 300,000 likes, (already) including several of my friends in Australia, as well as London pals. There was a fair bit of talk in the office today about the riots (also due to a few Pommies working here), but due to real-time updates on social media, we didn’t feel that far from our friends and family back home who were caught in the chaos. To the point that I was even able to see footage of the view from my friend’s living room in Camden, with smoke and fire outside.

For a few years now we have talked about how social media has made citizen journalists and the ‘democratisation of media’. But this it is all the more evident when an event likes this takes place. The other additional component I noticed with the riots, is how the neighbourhood watch concept is also on steroids courtesy of naming and shaming rioters on Facebook and You tube, increasing the odds of the opportunistic looters/arsonists getting caught. And just as quickly as London streets turned to rubble, up sprang a Twitter feed dedicated to cleaning up the mess and getting back to normal.

It is actually quite reassuring to see how the majority of law abiding people in the world can rally together via social media, even faster than the thugs.

Bookmark and Share

Google+ = Google – fun?

August 4, 2011

Dana IngsterDana Ingster

There’s a lot of chit-chat about Google+ at the moment. Most recently, there was this opinion piece in Mumbrella.

I get the attraction of Google+. I get that circles make sense in theory and have a lot of appeal. But what I think people are forgetting is that one of the biggest attractions about Facebook is the “stalkability” factor, and Mark Zuzkerberg’s ability to build a platform that played into people’s inherent desire to spy on each other. We get to go and have a little secret spy on what our quite-removed acquaintances are up to, what they ate for breakfast, and who they might be flirting with.

Google+ will mean that those people will only publish what they want us to see, and where’s the fun in that?

Bookmark and Share

Approach Facebook fanpages with caution

July 28, 2011

Briony Kanard

While researching the changing needs for consumers who are part of a social media community, I stumbled across this great article on the WOMMA website about Facebook presence. The article talks about how a more focused presence on Facebook is “beneficial to help spread conversation about brand experiences in social media”. The presence of Facebook enables users to engage and connect with brands and products they love while also promoting their beliefs within their networks which proves to be a very effective way of word-of-mouth marketing. The need to continuously update and maintain communication between brand/products and consumers is vital in order to maintain a relationship that will continue to keep members interested as well as gaining more fans, therefore creating growth and exposure of the brand/company.

So why doesn’t Soup have a Facebook page yet? Simple – we have been developing a Facebook page for some time now and are not quite happy with it yet. Here at Soup we like to make everything stand out – we are guilty of being a bunch of perfectionists at times. Not to worry though, we will let you know when our fantastic Facebook fan page is up and running.

Bookmark and Share


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.